National Labor Relations Board Determines Graduate Student Assistants Allowed to Organize

National Labor Relations Board Determines Graduate Student Assistants Allowed to Organize
September 20, 2016 dmock2015

On Tuesday, August 26, 2016, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled 3-1 that graduate students working in the capacity of research assistants and instructors at private universities are entitled to collective-bargaining rights.  The decision overturns the NLRB’s previous position that allowing graduate students to bargain would improperly intrude into the educational process.

Finding first that the statutory text of the National Labor Relations Act (Act) broadly defines “employee” to encompass student assistants who are common-law employees of their institutions, the NLRB then examined whether compelling statutory and policy considerations required an exception to this definition.   The NLRB rejected the notion that allowing graduate students to bargain would compromise academic decisions involving class size, time, length, and location, as well as decisions concerning the formatting of exams.  Columbia University could not persuade the Board that collective bargaining conflicted with student-teacher relationships, the educational process, or the traditional goals of higher education.

Private universities should be aware that this decision may have impacts beyond allowing graduate student assistants at private universities to form labor unions and collectively bargain.  The broad language of the ruling may also implicate undergraduate work-study programs.  Until subsequent decisions further clarify the impact of the “employee” classification for graduate students, private universities will be in uncharted territory when navigating the complexities of the student-employee relationship.

The full text of the NLRB decision can be found here.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Legal Disclaimer:

This content of this blog is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The transmission of information on this blog is not intended to establish, and receipt of such information does not establish or constitute, an attorney-client relationship. You should not act or rely on any information contained on this blog without first seeking the advice of an attorney.
 
This blog is not intended to be advertising, and Delfino Madden O’Malley Coyle & Koewler LLP does not desire to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blog or any articles contained on this blog in a jurisdiction where this email fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that jurisdiction.